PLRs are designed to foreclose on an opponent’s delay in disclosure or amendment to its theories, and expedite resolution of disputes related to those disclosures. Kayleigh E. McGlynn | Associate. Here we provide a brief description of what they are, how they are applied, and some reasons why you need to know them intimately. Facebook, Inc., Windy City Innovations, LLC, Stay up to date with COVID-19 related news, Services and Industry Experience Overview, Trademark, Copyright, and Media Litigation, IP Licensing, Transactions, and Agreements, Fish's Intellectual Property Law Essentials. Skilled in Statistical Data Analysis, Laboratory Skills, Communication, Scientific Writing, and Teaching. Join to Connect. Sept. 4, 2020) (PROST, Plager, O’Malley; additional views by Prost, O’Malley) (PTAB) (4 of 5 stars). (72), N.D. Ill. (69), N.D. Cal. (Source: Lex Machina). First, PLRs tend to make the timing of patent cases more predictable, which generally improves overall management of cases for the court and the litigants. “First Circuit Finds Device Patent Improperly Listed in the Orange Book,” co-authored with Brian Coggio, Fish Litigation Blog (June 26, 2020). summa cum laudeScholar of the College Phi Beta Kappa. Log in or sign up for Facebook to connect with friends, family and people you know. Kayleigh was previously a summer associate at Fish. 1-2. Log In. There are no material changes to the Additional Views. View the profiles of people named Kayleigh Campbell. (120), C.D. Ms. Chacon has extensive experience in the life sciences and pharmaceutical fields, including Hatch-Waxman... ​Michael A. Amon is the Vice Office Managing Principal of Fish & Richardson’s Southern California office. O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v. Monolithic Power Sys., Inc. Fish’s Intellectual Property Law Essentials. PLRs generally include deadlines and requirements relating to patent disclosures and claim construction proceedings—events unique to patent litigation that may be case-dispositive. Failure to follow these rules can cause an untimely disclosure of an infringement theory or defense to be dismissed/excluded from the case. Massachusetts Patent Litigation Wrap Up- August 2019. (65), and S.D.N.Y. [2] Delaware’s Default Standard for Discovery requires infringement and validity contentions along with specialized document production on par with more formal PLRs. Boston College Law School 2019 J.D. Mr. Amon previously clerked for the Hon. The Federal Circuit describes PLRs as “essentially a series of case management orders.”  See O2 Micro Int’l Ltd., 467 F.3d at 1363. “How Pandemic-Related Delays Affect Hatch-Waxman Litigants,” co-authored with Geoff Biegler and Madelyn McCormick, Law360 (May 21, 2020). Federal district courts throughout the country have enacted “patent local rules” that streamline how patent cases are litigated. Cir. (108), D.N.J. courts use those PLRs throughout that district. Q5. As you can see, only two jurisdictions do not have district-wide PLRs. Find your friends on Facebook. Kayleigh Campbell. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Party Names: The Doctrine of Equivalents in BPCIA Litigation. “Patent Local Rules: Knowing Them Well Can Make Litigating Your Case Smoother,” co-authored with Michael Amon, Ricardo Bonilla, Megan Chacon, Madelyn McCormick, Jason Wolff, Fish IP Law Essentials Blog (April 22, 2020). “A Biosimilar’s Guide to the BPCIA Patent Dance: Five Key Questions for Every Biosimilar Applicant to Consider,” co-authored with Michael Anderson, Grant Rice, Jenny Shmuel, and Cheryl Wang, Fish Litigation Blog (April 20, 2020). Newcastle … Generally, the schedule set forth in the PLRs (as modified by the court or the parties’ agreement, if applicable) becomes part of the scheduling order in a patent infringement case. Kayleigh McGlynn is a litigation associate in the Boston office of Fish & Richardson. “Introduction to Biologics and Biosimilars,” co-authored with Michael Anderson, Tracea Rice, Jenny Shmuel, Cheryl Wang, Fish IP Law Essentials Blog (June 4, 2020). Newcastle University. Kayleigh M. Campbell. Kayleigh Campbell. at 16. E. Supp. He previously worked in the patent group at Oracle... Kayleigh McGlynn is a litigation associate in the Boston office of Fish & Richardson. Your email address will not be published. In connection with this clinical work, she was named a Boston College Law School Public Interest Designation Fellow and awarded Pro Bono Excellence. Ms. McCormick was previously a Summer Associate with Fish. Which jurisdictions that hear the most patent cases have PLRs? [5] Judge Albright in the Waco Division has a standing order governing proceedings in patent cases that do require the core PLR disclosures. Other rules set presumptive limits on the number of claim terms to be construed and set deadlines for opening, responsive, and reply claim construction briefs. The Federal Circuit has consistently upheld PLRs as a proper exercise of the trial court’s case-management discretion, characterizing the rules as “seek[ing] to balance the right to develop new information in discovery with the need for certainty as to the legal theories.”  See O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v. Monolithic Power Sys., Inc., 467 F.3d 1355, 1366 (Fed.